Nichol Associates

Nichol Associates

Head Office: 0191 438 5432 Training Centre: 0191 4385432

HSE to begin recovering costs from law-breaking firms

The HSE’s much-publicised cost-recovery scheme, Fee for Intervention (FFI), comes into force next week (1 October).

Under the Health and Safety (Fees) Regulations 2012, the HSE has a duty to charge employers who break the law for the costs associated with the regulator’s related inspection, investigation and enforcement activities.

The Regulations are designed to shift the cost of health and safety enforcement from the public purse to businesses that contravene health and safety laws. Under FFI, when an HSE inspector visits a business and identifies a “material breach” of health and safety law, the business will have to pay a fee based on a rate of £124 per hour.

The fee will be applied to each intervention where a material breach is identified and any other associated work. Where the material breach is identified during a visit, costs for the whole visit are recoverable, from as soon as the HSE inspector enters the site to when they leave. The fee will also cover all work to ensure that the breach is remedied, as well as any investigation or enforcement action up to the point where the HSE’s intervention has been concluded, or prosecution proceedings begin.

A “material breach” is defined as a contravention of health and safety law that requires an inspector to issue a written notice to the duty-holder. This may be notification of a contravention, an Improvement or Prohibition Notice, or a prosecution, and must include the law that the inspector’s opinion relates to; the reasons for their opinion; and notification that a fee is payable to the HSE.

Businesses in compliance with their legal obligations will not have to pay a penny, according to the regulator, which hopes that FFI will act as a further incentive for duty-holders to operate within the law and help level the playing field between compliant and non-compliant employers.

HSE chief executive Geoffrey Podger said: “The most basic safety mistakes in the workplace can devastate lives and result in real costs to industry. It is right that those who fail to meet their legal obligations should pay HSE’s costs rather than the public purse having to do so.”

Legal experts have questioned aspects of the FFI scheme, during the lead-up to its statutory introduction. David Young, head of the health and safety team at Eversheds, said the different health and safety prosecution regimes in England and Scotland ““ where, in the latter, HSE legal costs are not retrievable through the courts ““ could have an impact on investigations of businesses north of the border.¨He said: “This may cause concern to those companies with interests north of the border, which could find themselves in the position of being investigated but not prosecuted on the basis that fees can be recovered up to the point of commencement of prosecution, but not after.”

Young also reiterated concerns that the scheme may create added tensions between inspectors and businesses, especially given the charges that could be involved. He explained: “From my experience, most recent cases include average HSE inspector rates of around £66 per hour, so this will be a significant increase, particularly as it will be payable without a prosecution.

“For any business to effectively double its charge-out rate to absorb minor sundry items would be impossible, yet that is the very real case that UK business face from 1 October. I imagine that relationships between businesses and some inspectors will become uneasy for a while until the practical application of FFI is clearer.”

IOSH welcomed the scheme in principle, but conceded that there could be pitfalls with implementation. Said head of policy and public affairs, Richard Jones: “It’s vital that this new scheme is monitored and reviewed to ensure it operates as planned and that there are no unintended negative consequences. The HSE needs to ensure consistency and proportionality, and that constructive, effective relationships between duty-holders and themselves are maintained for the initiative to function as it should.”

Following a draft publication issued in the summer, the HSE has now published a full downloadable guide to the FFI scheme on its website at:

Details on what the Executive identifies as the most basic safety mistakes in the workplace can also be viewed at:

Other News

Second prosecution in eight years sees boss jailed for manslaughter

The boss of a firm contracted by a Tyneside maritime construction company to dismantle a shipyard building has been jailed for the manslaughter by gross negligence of one his workers. Allan Turnbull, 61, trading as A&H Site Line Boring and Machining, based in Bishop Auckland, Co. Durham was hired by North Eastern Maritime Offshore Cluster […]


e-learning takes the heat and hassle out of modern asbestos training

North East based asbestos specialists Nichol Associates has announced yet another addition to the training arm of its business, in the form of fully accessible Computer Based Training (CBT), better known as e-learning. Courses can be found at the training area of our website.  The news comes in the wake of the announcement last month […]


Mystery As Asbestos Cancer Takes Man’s Life

A distraught mother broke down yesterday after she told how her young son died from a rare form of cancer normally associated with exposure to asbestos fibres. Thomas Harry Martin, 28, recently passed away after suffering from malignant mesothelioma, which is normally the cause of death of older workers who have been exposed to asbestos […]


Newsletter sign up